
This book strongly challenges the philosophical self-limitations of
science and the deterministic idea that we are all basically just very complex
machines, but it fails to break free of a different kind of self-limitation,
the idea that humanity must find its own way to explain its own existence
without reference to God. The author accuses science of ruling out any
knowledge outside its own but, really, he does the same thing by ruling out, in
effect, the knowledge of God.”
So the book is a rather audacious attack on the audacity of science. (How
could I resist doing a blog about that?!? I hope I didn’t come across as
audacious in my review!)
To be clear, we are talking here about neuroscientists, evolutionists
and molecular biologists who have been making grandiose claims that their
scientific disciplines are on the verge of explaining things like human thought,
creativity and personality. Richard Dawkins talks about ‘memes’, which are
basically the cultural equivalent to genes. In other words, we inherit a set of
genes that determine how tall we will be, what colour eyes we will have, etc,
and we also inherit a set of views and values (memes) that determine our
culture and personality. Why is this audacious? Because it’s presented as fact (or
so highly probable that we may as well present it as fact) when it’s actually
nothing more than sheer imagination.
The great obsession of science is to be able to explain everything –
yes, literally everything! But, by ignoring the evidence for God (eg, in the
brilliant natural design that we see everywhere in the world) on the basis that
they will someday be able to explain these things without reference to God, these
modern scientists only demonstrate their own foolishness.
(By the way, if you can't read the slogan on Dawkins' shirt, it says "RELIGION - together we can find the cure."
(By the way, if you can't read the slogan on Dawkins' shirt, it says "RELIGION - together we can find the cure."
No comments:
Post a Comment